Posts Tagged ‘Poland’

ALL PATRIOTS SHOULD READ AND SHARE THESE WORDS

Saturday, March 6th, 2010

What follows is a chapter from Behold A Pale Horse, by William Cooper, who gave his life in the name of truth and freedom.

EVERYONE WHO LOVES FREEDOM SHOULD READ THIS BOOK!!!  IT IS STILL THE MOST IMPORTANT BOOK IN THE FREEDOM AND RESTORATION MOVEMENT!! THE LESSONS STILL HOLD GREAT VALUE FOR THE PRESENT AND THE FUTURE!! MORE POWERFUL THAN ANY PROTEST, MORE ANSWERS THAN QUESTIONS, AND A GUIDE TO STRENTHEN THE CAUSE AND UNDERSTAND THE OPPOSITION!!

 

CHAPTER 10

LESSONS

FROM

LITHUANIA


A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a

free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall

not be infringed.

AMENDMENT II

Constitution of the U.S.

I know not what others may do. But as for me,

give me liberty or give me death.

Patrick Henry

EXPLANATION

I had intended to write a long and thoroughly referenced chapter on

the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, the right of the

people to keep and bear arms.

I had to eat humble pie when I read the following text entitled "Lessons

from Lithuania” by Neal Knox. It was contributed by a member of the

Citizens Agency for Joint Intelligence. I was impressed by its simplicity

and ability to deliver with very few words the precise message that I had

intended to convey in twenty pages. Since I believe that sometimes less is

more, and since my ego has nothing to do with this book and its message,

"Lessons from Lithuania" has been printed in its entirety, with no changes,

as the complete chapter on the Second Amendment. Try as I might, I could

never improve upon Neal’s simple statement.

My deepest appreciation to Neal Knox and The Firearms Coalition for

permission to use "Lessons from Lithuania."

LESSONS FROM LITHUANIA

by Neal Knox

Those who avoid and evade the reason for the Second Amendment to

the U.S. Constitution would surely admit that if Lithuania had a Second

Amendment, Mikhail Gorbachev violated it on March 22,1990 — Russian

troops seized arms from the Lithuanian militia. Or was "the right of the

people to keep and bear arms" actually violated two days earlier, when

Premier Gorbachev ordered private citizens to turn in their hunting and

competition guns to the Russian army within one week "for temporary

safekeeping" or have them confiscated and their owners imprisoned? Or

was "the right of the people to keep and bear arms" initially violated many

years before, when the people were first prohibited from possessing guns

without permission of government and laws were passed requiring every

gun to be registered? In fact, the Soviet Constitution guarantees the people

the right to keep and bear arms, and Lithuania is part of the Soviet Union

— or so Gorbachev contends. But obviously the Soviet government pays

no more attention to that constitutional freedom guarantee than do the

majority of the U.S. government, the International Association of Chiefs of

Police, or CBS and the Washington Post. What is the difference, precisely,

between the confiscation of private firearms in Lithuania and the confiscation

ordered by S. 166, the Graves bill now pending in the New Jersey

Senate? What is the difference, precisely, between the registration law in

Lithuania — which makes confiscation possible — and the registration of

military-style firearms required by California’s Roberti-Roos bill, which

went into effect January 1,1990. What is the difference, precisely, between

Lithuania’s law prohibiting the people from owning military-style firearms

and the so-called "assault rifle" bans now pending in both houses of

Congress and in many states? The difference is that the people of the

United States are free men and women who can trust their benevolent

government. FOREVER?

NOTE: Nothing has so clearly demonstrated the reasons for the Second

Amendment and the reasons it must be defended than when on Dec. 14,1981,

when Gen. Jaruzelski declared martial law in Poland, placed all press under total

government control, and declared all firearms licenses and gun registration certificates

void — requiring the licensed owners to turn in their registered guns within

48 hours. Of course, since the government knew where every gun was — except

those in the hands of criminals — they had no choice but to comply.

Please download this file, print it out and send it to your local newspaper

— putting your name on it if you think it will cause more letters

editors to run it. Also please upload it to as many other bulletin boards and

nets as possible.

Neal Knox

The Firearms Coalition

Box 6537

Silver Spring, MD 20906

Author’s Note: This is a lesson that we hope to learn only from reading and

not in the manner learned by the Poles and Lithuanians. After reading the

above, I hope you will agree with me that anyone who attempts to subvert the

Second Amendment or any other section or legal amendment of the Constitution

is a traitor and should be arrested and tried for treason. I hope that you

will copy this chapter and distribute it as widely as possible, to as many

people as possible. Education is more than half the battle.

In case you have not guessed by now, the fact that most Americans own at

least one firearms weapon is the only thing that has kept the New World

Order at bay.

A Ray of Hope: As of January 8, 1991, less than 10% of all California gun

owners have registered their firearms. Many Californians stood in the streets

with weapons in hand and publicly burned the registration forms. Network

news did not cover these demonstrations, and no mention has been made on

television that California gun owners have ignored this unconstitutional gunregistration

law.

 

http://restoretherepublic.net/article/2928/all-patriots-should-read-and-share-these-words

Cooper – Behold a Pale Horse (#1 Underground Bestseller of All Time) (1991)

Brown’s Britain 2015 and even the Queen has fled

Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010

Dateline: London, March 1, 2015

The State of Emergency introduced in May 2010 is to be extended for another five years, Prime Minister-for-Life Gordon Brown announced in London yesterday.

Such was the scale of the crisis facing the country that a General Election could only lead to instability.

Labour would continue in power indefinitely, Brown pledged. He was getting on with the job, taking the difficult decisions, which is what people wanted him to do.

image

Terrifying: Life under Gordon Brown in 2015 would be pretty grim, says Richard Littlejohn

This was no time for a novice, the Prime Minister-for-Life insisted. The people had spoken when they rejected the Etonian salesman Cameron in May 2010. There was no need for a fresh mandate.

Even though the Conservatives won the popular vote and became the largest party at Westminster, they failed to secure an overall majority in the Commons, as a result of boundary changes introduced by Labour.

For almost a week after the results were declared, Brown refused to leave Number 10 Downing Street. The only evidence that someone was still inside was the fusillade of mobile phones and computer keyboards being thrown out of the windows.

Eventually, he put out a deranged statement on YouTube in which he blamed the election result on the low turn-out caused by the worst winter weather in 30 years, which began in America.

The Government announced the top rate of tax was being increased to 110 per cent on all incomes above £50,000, VAT was to rise to 50 per cent and stamp duty would be levied at 33 per cent on all property sales, except caravans and mobile homes belonging to members of the travelling community.

Hedge fund managers and most of the City of London had already decamped abroad to avoid penal rates of taxation.

They were followed in quick succession by thousands of British plumbers and bricklayers, who decided to seek a better life in Poland.

The financial markets went into meltdown. When the pound plunged to parity with the Zimbabwean dollar, the IMF cut off Britain’s line of credit.

In a desperate attempt to prevent national insolvency, Balls approached several of those companies, promoted by Carol Vorderman, which promise to consolidate all your loans into one easy monthly payment, even if you have CCJs. But he was turned down flat.

Unemployment rocketed to 25 per cent, except in Newcastle, the North-West, Scotland and Northern Ireland, where nine out of ten people now work for the Government.

Vince Cable resigned from Parliament to become guest host of Strictly Come Dancing, after being overlooked for Chancellor when Balls resigned following a fist fight with Brown, which the Prime Minister-for-Life later denied, saying he’d never hit anyone, honest.

The LibDems left the coalition soon afterwards, when it became apparent Brown had no intention of fulfilling his promise to introduce PR.

After failing to form a new alliance with Sinn Fein, Respect and Nick Griffin (BNP MP for Barking), Brown declared a State of Emergency, under powers drawn up in wartime.

He claimed that he had the authority, since the threat from the economic crisis, which began in America, was at least as great as that posed by the Nazis in 1939, or his name wasn’t Winston Churchill.

As Britain was now a full province of the European Union, pursuant to a little-known clause hidden in the small print of the Lisbon Treaty, Parliament was abolished.

That was when Brown declared himself Prime Minister-for-Life. His position was endorsed by the new President-in-Perpetuity of Europe, Lord Mandelson, speaking from his official suite on board a Russian yacht off Corfu.

Protesters who tried to storm Downing Street were repelled by three divisions of the European Defence Force, under the command of an EU Reichsmarschall from the 17th Panzer Division, now garrisoned at Aldershot.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1254697/RICHARD-LITTLEJOHN-Browns-Britain-2015-Queen-fled.html#ixzz0h2MsDnCv

Frustrated Ryanair passenger eats €10,000 winning scratchcard

Monday, March 1st, 2010

Richard Gray
Irish Independent
Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:26 EST

An angry airline passenger ate a €10,000 winning scratchcard after he was told he could not claim the money immediately.
The unnamed man was flying with Ryanair from Krakow, in Poland, to East Midlands Airport when he won €10,000 with the scratch card.
Cabin crew on the flight confirmed he had a winning card, but told the passenger he would have to collect the jackpot directly from the company that runs the competition as they did not have enough cash on board the plane.
Ryanair said the man then became frustrated and started to eat his winning ticket while on the flight on Thursday.
His rash actions mean he has lost any chance of claiming the prize money, which will now be donated to charity.
Stephen McNamara, a spokesman for Ryanair, said the cabin crew and some passengers had attempted to persaude the man not to eat the ticket, but he stood up and ate it anyway.
Stephen McNamara, a spokesman for the airline, said: "Passengers have always been delighted to claim their large cash prizes after returning home.
"Unfortunately our latest winner felt that we should have his €10,000 prize kicking around on the aircraft.
"Crew tried to stop the air Gourmet Scratch Card eater by offering him one of our great tasting sandwiches, pizzas or snacks instead, but clearly he had much more expensive tastes!"
Ryanair is now asking passengers to vote online to decide where the money should go.

 

http://www.sott.net/articles/show/203883-Frustrated-Ryanair-passenger-eats-10-000-winning-scratchcard

China Could Build Up Nuclear Capability to Counter U.S. Missile Shield

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

Global Research, February 25, 2010

RIA Novosti – 2010-02-24

MOSCOW — China could strengthen its nuclear capability in response to U.S. global missile defense plans, a Russian military expert said on Wednesday.

"At present, China has a very limited nuclear potential, but my recent contacts with Chinese military representatives indicate that if the United States deploys a global missile defense system, in particular in the Far East, China will build up its offensive capability," said Lt. Gen. Yevgeny Buzhinsky, former department deputy head in the Russian Defense Ministry.

He did not elaborate on how a potential missile shield could be countered with nuclear weapons or why it would threaten China.

So far Washington has been mostly preoccupied with a missile shield in Central Europe and says it is needed to counter potential Iranian strikes.

In a move to ease Moscow’s concerns, Obama last year scrapped plans to deploy interceptor missiles in Poland and a radar system in the Czech Republic.

Earlier this month, however, Romania and Bulgaria said they were in talks with Obama’s administration to deploy elements of the U.S. missile shield on their territories from 2015.

 

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=17801

SOTT.NET

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

Latest World News

U.S. News

More Recent News

UK & Euro-Asian News

More Recent News

Around the World

More Recent News

Big Brother

More Recent News

Axis of Evil

More Recent News

Middle East Madness

More Recent News

Grand Theft Economics

More Recent News

The Living Planet

More Recent News

Health & Wellness

More Recent News

Science & Technology

More Recent News

Our Haunted Planet

More Recent News

Don’t Panic! Lighten Up!

More Recent News

http://www.sott.net/

17 visitors online now
16 guests, 1 members
Max visitors today: 47 at 11:29 am GMT+5
This month: 71 at 03-10-2010 09:32 pm GMT+5
This year: 101 at 02-07-2010 04:05 pm GMT+5
All time: 101 at 02-07-2010 04:05 pm GMT+5